SMILE IV is the next research exploration in the roadmap of the SMILE program, leveraging the results of the previous projects SMILE I/II/III to further develop enabling technologies and implement safety assurance framework on the new types of transport services enabled by small autonomous vehicles: transport robots in factory settings and delivery robots in public spaces. 

SMILE IV focuses on optimizing and implementing the safety architecture and safety components for the two distinct use cases of small autonomous vehicles operating in different environments and conditions.

By challenging the approach with diverse use cases and requirements from different domains, the results from SMILE IV will be also of high interest for automotive and other industrial actors that plan to use DL to support autonomous functions in safety critical applications.

Ammonia is heavily discussed as an alternative fuel to be used in shipping. The advantage of using ammonia as fuel is the already existing methods for producing "green" ammonia and ammonia does not release carbon dioxide upon combustion. Ammonia as fuel in shipping could contribute to reducing green house gas emissions from shipping. However, there are certain risks with ammonia. Ammonia is highly corrosive and toxic. Upon exposure, it may cause severe damage if ingested or comes into contact with skin or eyes. Inhaling ammonia gas can cause permanent damage to lungs and other mocous membranes.

The purpose of this pre-study is to examine potential barriers surrounding the introduction of ammonia as ship fuel, focusing on technical and operational safety aspects. The project's goal is to deepen the understanding of ammonia's potential as a ship fuel from a safety perspective. Furthermore the project wish to set ground for the industry's overarching goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions in shipping.

In order to ensure relevance and broad industry involvement, the pre-study is conducted in collaboration with a diverse reference group of relevant stakeholders within the industry. Input from stakeholders (such as crew members, response units, ship and propulsion manufacturers, ship operators, classification societies, and government authorities) will be collected in a workshop format.

If you have an interest of participating in upcoming workshops, please contact the coordinator for further information."

This pilot study delves into a comprehensive analysis of real-world cybersecurity incidents that have impacted various sectors within society. By examining the measures taken during and post-incident and the reevaluation of organisational security strategies, this study aims to uncover insights that could reshape future security practices.

The core hypothesis driving this study is multifaceted. Firstly, it postulates that organizations that have previously experienced major cybersecurity incidents are better equipped to handle subsequent incidents due to their transition to a heightened state of readiness for the vulnerabilities encountered in attacks, as well as for future cybersecurity threats in general. These experiences comprises both elevated security and awareness of vulnerabilities, as well as resilience through adapting practices that can cope operationally with disturbances in IT-systems, no matter their cause.

Furthermore, the study acknowledges the intricate interplay of human, organisational, and technological factors within cybersecurity incidents and their aftermath. It recognizes that robust security encompasses not only technological prowess, but also effective people-centric processes. The triad of people, processes, and technology forms the backbone of security, with individuals as the linchpin binding them together. Relatedly, the study recognises the importance of designing both technology and organisational structures to empower individuals to make informed decisions and navigate emerging risks in the rapidly evolving digital landscape.

The research draws on our ongoing investigation in human-centred cybersecurity leveraging insights from behavioural science to understand the decision-making processes involved in incident responses. The pilot study encompasses a diverse set of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred across different sectors in Sweden. From a ransomware incident that had far-reaching consequences for a local municipality to high-profile attacks on multinational corporations and sensitive medical records leakage, the study spans incidents with significant societal implications. The insights collected from these cases are expected to pave the way for continued research with tangible societal relevance, empowering stakeholders to effectively navigate the aftermath of cybersecurity incidents.

The outcomes of this pilot study are anticipated to extend beyond academia. The methods and competences cultivated through this research are poised to become invaluable assets, sought-after by industries and stakeholders alike to bolster their readiness and resilience against future incidents. As industry players grapple with the ever-present threat of cyberattacks, the research conducted here holds the potential to forge a path towards systematic learning from real-world incident experiences.

The purpose of the project is to create a structured forum for dialogue on the regulation of automated driving, where actors from industry, public authorities, and research can exchange experiences and contribute to the development of fit-for-purpose regulatory frameworks. Through roundtable discussions, mutual learning is enabled and understanding is fostered regarding how different actors interpret and work with regulatory frameworks. In parallel, the project conducts research activities to inform and support the forum.

The project not only supports vehicle manufacturers, operators, and other stakeholders in taking the next steps in the field of automated driving—regarding technological development, testing, and implementation—but also provides public authorities with valuable insights into how industry reasons about and interprets regulations. At the same time, public authorities are given the opportunity to provide input to industry and research. In this way, the project contributes to strengthening collaboration and creating a common foundation for future regulatory development—both nationally and internationally.

The project monitors developments in international and national regulatory frameworks affecting automated driving. Download the latest version of the report “Steering the Future: An Overview of Current and Upcoming Regulations in Automated Driving” (v1.0) here: https://ri.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1903211&dswid=2841.

In a policy brief, we present key takeaways and highlights from the roundtable discussions held during the network's first year. You can access it here: https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn%3Anbn%3Ase%3Ari%3Adiva-76333. A second policy brief brings together the most important insights and reflections from the project's second and final year. Read it here: https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn%3Anbn%3Ase%3Ari%3Adiva-82795.

The project’s final report can be downloaded here:
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn%3Anbn%3Ase%3Ari%3Adiva-80652.

Bakgrund och syfte

Automatiserad körning har potential att kunna revolutionera vårt sätt att resa och avsevärt förbättra trafiksäkerheten. Samtidigt kan det med den nya tekniken komma nya trafiksäkerhetsutmaningar. Det är viktigt att adressera dessa utmaningar för att säkerställa en säker och lyckad introduktion av automatiserade fordon i transportsystemet.

Inom FN:s ekonomiska kommission för Europa (UNECE) pågår just nu ett arbete med att ta fram ett nytt legalt instrument (new Legal Instrument on the use of Automated Vehicles in traffic, LIAV) som ska komplettera 1949 och 1968 års vägtrafikkonventioner. Det legala instrumentet ska innehålla definitioner och en uppsättning rättsliga bestämmelser för en säker användning av automatiserade fordon i trafik. Bestämmelserna ska syfta till att säkerställa trafiksäkerheten, särskilt för oskyddade trafikanter. En expertgrupp är tillsatt för att ta fram ett förslag till ett sådant legalt instrument. En uppgift för expertgruppen är att försöka identifiera relevanta trafiksäkerhetsrisker relaterade till automatiserade fordon, eftersom det nya legala instrumentet bör ta itu med dem.

Projektet ”Inspel till nytt legalt instrument om säker användning av automatiserade fordon” (eller ”Inspel till LIAV”) bidrar med forskningsbaserade underlag till det pågående arbetet på internationell nivå. Vi undersöker vad ett kommande legalt instrument behöver adressera för säkerhetsfrågor (och möjligen skyldigheter) för att automatiserad körning ska ske på ett säkert sätt. Det handlar om att identifiera, analysera och öka kunskapen om trafiksäkerhetsutmaningar och juridiska konsekvenser samt behovet av regler för att säkerställa trafiksäkerheten vid automatiserad körning.

Nytta/effekt

Projektet förväntas ge kunskap om minimikrav som bör ställas i ett nytt internationellt regelverk för automatiserad körning. Det kan ge värdefull information till frågan om hur automatiserad körning kan göra det säkrare i vägtrafiken.

Projektresultat

Slutrapporten finns att hämta här: https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn%3Anbn%3Ase%3Ari%3Adiva-78778. 

The risk management process in ISO 31000 is visualized in the figure above. Key steps apart from the actual risk assessment is about problem framing, i.e. setting the context, and communication with those who own the risk or are affected by it. Based on our research and contacts with industry or via accident investigations, RISE has a unique competence in many areas and industries that is used in our work within risk. Depending on the area or industry, we also use other methodologies and standards such as ISO 22000.

Contact us for more information about what expertise we offer within your area.

The research project

The Formas project "Not My Responsibility! (NoMR!) - Improved Wildfire Preparedness through Cross-Sectoral Dialogue" aims to form a holistic description of vulnerability that is quantifiable and transferable from spatial and temporal variables. Using this as a basis, the distribution of responsibility and roles of actors can be described and processed in the cross-sectoral dialogue.

The climate and vegetation fires

Future climate is expected to prolong wildfire seasons in Sweden and increase the occurrence of severe dry spells. This will increase society’s vulnerability against wildfires which in turn requires climate change adaptation strategies among the public, home-owners, municipalities as well as land owners. What these climate adaptation strategies are, how they will be implemented and or who’s responsibility it is to maintain them is not clear.

Risk and vulnerability

In this project, we seek to add all subcomponents that together affects the risk and vulnerability against wildfires. We also seek to gather different actors from different sectors having different interests to form a cross-sectoral dialogue enabling a common understanding och knowledge base to assess vulnerability and determine responsibility between the different actors. The project aims to form a holistic description of vulnerability that is quantifiable and transferable from spatial and temporal variables.

Information and dialogue

The project will also start a programme for fire safe communities where educational material for climate adaptation on a local (homes and settlements), regional (land managers) and national perspectives will be provided. The project will also, in addition to preparedness, contribute with knowledge for guidance of suppression activities in the wildlandurban interface.